These sites have resulted in a new and diverse field of film stars excelling at their craft.Īll body types, genders, identities, ages, kinks, and abilities are increasingly visible in the world of porn. These sites, while far from perfect, have added a dose of reality to adult media, as we are given intimate glimpses into performers’ homes - their real sex lives, their real partners and playmates - and have, perhaps indirectly, fueled necessary dialogue about sex worker autonomy and internet censorship. This is why so much studio porn online is problematic: It’s overwhelmingly white and cisgender, plays heavily to sexist and racist sterotypes, and enforces unheatlhy body images and behaviors.īut in recent years, video subscription sites like OnlyFans and JustForFans have democratized the industry, cutting out the intermediary to allow performers to supply direct-to-consumer “amateur” content. Often directors and studio owners hired the models they personally liked. The successful ones had to fit to standards and types that studios thought were sellable. In the old days of porn - less than 10 years ago - porn studios decided which performers made it and which ones did not.